Internal documentation was sufficient
A new ruling from the Copenhagen City Court clarifies when an airline can avoid paying compensation for a canceled flight. The case concerned whether the passenger had been informed of the cancellation at least 14 days before departure. The court ruled that the airline's internal documentation was sufficient and, therefore, the airline did not have to pay compensation.
A passenger had his flight canceled and claimed compensation. The airline denied the claim, claiming they had informed the passenger of the cancellation at least 14 days before departure and did not have to pay compensation.
The burden of proof can be shifted back to the passenger
In this case, the airline was able to prove that the travel agency had sent a message about the cancellation to the passenger's registered email address. The court ruled that the airline's internal electronic registrations and system information were sufficient evidence. The burden of proof shifted back to the passenger, who was now responsible for proving that the notice was not received in time. The court concluded that the airline had met its burden of proof and did not have to pay compensation.
IUNO believes
The case shows that the airline's internal documentation can be enough to prove that a passenger has been informed of a cancellation within the time limit.
IUNO recommends that airlines ensure they have documentation that the notification was sent to the passenger's registered email address and that their internal systems can confirm the transmission. This way, the airline can shift the burden of proof back to the passenger and avoid paying compensation.
[Copenhagen City Court judgment of 31 October 2024 in case BS-7325/2021-KBH]
A passenger had his flight canceled and claimed compensation. The airline denied the claim, claiming they had informed the passenger of the cancellation at least 14 days before departure and did not have to pay compensation.
The burden of proof can be shifted back to the passenger
In this case, the airline was able to prove that the travel agency had sent a message about the cancellation to the passenger's registered email address. The court ruled that the airline's internal electronic registrations and system information were sufficient evidence. The burden of proof shifted back to the passenger, who was now responsible for proving that the notice was not received in time. The court concluded that the airline had met its burden of proof and did not have to pay compensation.
IUNO believes
The case shows that the airline's internal documentation can be enough to prove that a passenger has been informed of a cancellation within the time limit.
IUNO recommends that airlines ensure they have documentation that the notification was sent to the passenger's registered email address and that their internal systems can confirm the transmission. This way, the airline can shift the burden of proof back to the passenger and avoid paying compensation.
[Copenhagen City Court judgment of 31 October 2024 in case BS-7325/2021-KBH]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Andrea
Brix Danielsen
Legal advisor
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Junior legal advisor
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Benedicte
Rodian
Senior legal assistant
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilia
Naledi Madonsela Mikkelsen
Legal assistant
Emma
Engvang Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal advisor
Frederikke
Kirkegaard Thalund
Senior legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Junior legal advisor
Frida
Aas Ahlquist
Senior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Junior legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Legal assistant
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Jacqueline
Lucia Chrillesen
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Legal advisor
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nanna
Damkjær
Junior legal advsior
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Junior legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Legal assistant