Claims for compensation and interest must be sent to the correct email address
A recent ruling from Norway’s Borgarting Court of Appeal highlights the importance of passengers submitting their claims for compensation and interest through the correct airline contact channels.
Two passengers tried to claim an interest in addition to the compensation they had already received for a delayed flight. The core issue in the case was whether the passengers’ representative had submitted the claim correctly under the Norwegian Interest Act.
Inaction was the deciding factor
Borgarting Court of Appeal, one of Norway’s six regional courts, concluded that the claim did not comply with the Interest Act. The representative had sent the claim to a general email address instead of using the airline's designated contact form. The court emphasised that the airline had never consented to receiving claims via the email used.
Furthermore, the representative did not respond to the airline’s automatic reply to the claim, which referred them to an online form instead. The court ruled that the representative had shown passivity, which was why the case was prolonged. As a result, the airline was acquitted of the interest claim and awarded legal costs. The passengers ended up covering the bill.
IUNO’s opinion
This case demonstrates that passengers and their representatives cannot claim interest if they submit the claim incorrectly and remain passive when notified. IUNO recommends that airlines clearly communicate where and how claims must be submitted. This way, airlines can protect themselves from interest claims.
[Borgarting Court of Appeal judgment of 11 May 2024 in case LB-2023-181690]
Two passengers tried to claim an interest in addition to the compensation they had already received for a delayed flight. The core issue in the case was whether the passengers’ representative had submitted the claim correctly under the Norwegian Interest Act.
Inaction was the deciding factor
Borgarting Court of Appeal, one of Norway’s six regional courts, concluded that the claim did not comply with the Interest Act. The representative had sent the claim to a general email address instead of using the airline's designated contact form. The court emphasised that the airline had never consented to receiving claims via the email used.
Furthermore, the representative did not respond to the airline’s automatic reply to the claim, which referred them to an online form instead. The court ruled that the representative had shown passivity, which was why the case was prolonged. As a result, the airline was acquitted of the interest claim and awarded legal costs. The passengers ended up covering the bill.
IUNO’s opinion
This case demonstrates that passengers and their representatives cannot claim interest if they submit the claim incorrectly and remain passive when notified. IUNO recommends that airlines clearly communicate where and how claims must be submitted. This way, airlines can protect themselves from interest claims.
[Borgarting Court of Appeal judgment of 11 May 2024 in case LB-2023-181690]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Albert
Berg Giese
Junior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Ferguson Bille-Biggart
Junior legal assistant
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager (leave of absence)
Anna
Laura Brohl Larsen
Junior legal assistant
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilie
Mehl Bagger
Junior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Freja
Pedersen
Junior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Senior legal manager
Isabella
Fjording
Junior legal assistant
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Johanne
Alberte Liljeborg
Junior legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal assistant
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Senior legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager (leave of absence)
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Junior legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Senior legal advisor
Mathias
Rex Brohus
Junior legal assistant
Mathilde
Bjørn Bjerring
Junior legal assistant
Mathilde
Stenderup
Junior legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Merle
Frisendahl Fog
Junior legal assistant
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Senior legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Junior legal advisor
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor (leave of absence)