Do strikes constitute extraordinary circumstances?
In Scandinavia, focus in the passing weeks has been on labour disputes in the aviation sector. Cabin crew at a major Scandinavian airline went on strike for several days and pilots at another Scandinavian airline have ceased work. Here, we provide our evaluation of whether passengers are entitled to compensation when their flights get cancelled or delayed due to labour disputes.
The strikes in the aviation sector for the passing weeks have resulted in a massive amount of delays and cancellations of scheduled departures, and the airlines have suffered huge losses. This raises a lot of questions relating to the EU-Regulation 261, including whether the passengers are entitled to compensation when labour disputes cause their flights to be cancelled or delayed. The views differ in the media and between different authorities – here we provide our evaluation of these cases.
In general, passengers are entitled to compensation if the flight is cancelled or delayed by three hours or more. The airline is only exempt from liability if the airline proves that the delay / cancellation was caused by extraordinary circumstances (EOC) and that the circumstances could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
The legal position in Denmark
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has not yet decided whether labour disputes are qualified as EOC and thus the question must be handled based on national case law and the preamble of the regulation.
In Denmark, the Eastern High Court handed down a judgment regarding this matter a few years ago, in which the court ruled in favour of the airline. The court found that the labour dispute constituted an EOC and that the airline had done everything within their power to avoid the cancellation; e.g. by trying to lease a substituting aircraft. However, the court stressed that this depends on an individual assessment in each case.
Thus, the legal position in Denmark is that labour disputes may constitute an EOC – especially if the strike contravenes with the collective agreement. But even if the strike has been announced according to the agreement, it may still be considered an EOC. This was what applied in the above-mentioned case – and even though the labour dispute was commenced by the airline (lockout of employees, not a strike), it was considered an EOC. With regards to this judgment, EOC seems to have a wide scope in relation to labour disputes. This is supported by the fact that strikes are mentioned in the preamble to the regulation as a possible EOC.
However, even if the strike is considered an EOC, airlines should keep in mind that it is a condition for compensation exemption that all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid the cancellation / delay, e.g. by trying to acquire crew from other sources or to lease aircrafts including crew from a subcontractor.
In summary
Claims for compensation originating from delays or cancellations caused by labour disputes should be evaluated thoroughly. In our opinion, strikes probably constitute an EOC under Danish law, and if the airline has taken all reasonable measures to avoid the delay / cancellation, our general advice would be to reject claims for compensation. However, the right to compensation is according to case law dependent on an individual assessment of each case and such evaluation must therefore always be made.
The strikes in the aviation sector for the passing weeks have resulted in a massive amount of delays and cancellations of scheduled departures, and the airlines have suffered huge losses. This raises a lot of questions relating to the EU-Regulation 261, including whether the passengers are entitled to compensation when labour disputes cause their flights to be cancelled or delayed. The views differ in the media and between different authorities – here we provide our evaluation of these cases.
In general, passengers are entitled to compensation if the flight is cancelled or delayed by three hours or more. The airline is only exempt from liability if the airline proves that the delay / cancellation was caused by extraordinary circumstances (EOC) and that the circumstances could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
The legal position in Denmark
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has not yet decided whether labour disputes are qualified as EOC and thus the question must be handled based on national case law and the preamble of the regulation.
In Denmark, the Eastern High Court handed down a judgment regarding this matter a few years ago, in which the court ruled in favour of the airline. The court found that the labour dispute constituted an EOC and that the airline had done everything within their power to avoid the cancellation; e.g. by trying to lease a substituting aircraft. However, the court stressed that this depends on an individual assessment in each case.
Thus, the legal position in Denmark is that labour disputes may constitute an EOC – especially if the strike contravenes with the collective agreement. But even if the strike has been announced according to the agreement, it may still be considered an EOC. This was what applied in the above-mentioned case – and even though the labour dispute was commenced by the airline (lockout of employees, not a strike), it was considered an EOC. With regards to this judgment, EOC seems to have a wide scope in relation to labour disputes. This is supported by the fact that strikes are mentioned in the preamble to the regulation as a possible EOC.
However, even if the strike is considered an EOC, airlines should keep in mind that it is a condition for compensation exemption that all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid the cancellation / delay, e.g. by trying to acquire crew from other sources or to lease aircrafts including crew from a subcontractor.
In summary
Claims for compensation originating from delays or cancellations caused by labour disputes should be evaluated thoroughly. In our opinion, strikes probably constitute an EOC under Danish law, and if the airline has taken all reasonable measures to avoid the delay / cancellation, our general advice would be to reject claims for compensation. However, the right to compensation is according to case law dependent on an individual assessment of each case and such evaluation must therefore always be made.
Receive our newsletter

Aage
Krogh
PartnerSimilar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Junior legal advisor
Albert
Berg Giese
Legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Ferguson Bille-Biggart
Junior legal assistant
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager (leave of absence)
Anna
Laura Brohl Larsen
Junior legal assistant
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilie
Mehl Bagger
Junior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Freja
Pedersen
Junior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Senior legal manager
Isabella
Fjording
Junior legal assistant
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Johanne
Alberte Liljeborg
Junior legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal advisor
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Senior legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Junior legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Senior legal advisor
Mathias
Rex Brohus
Junior legal assistant
Mathilde
Bjørn Bjerring
Junior legal assistant
Mathilde
Stenderup
Junior legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Merle
Frisendahl Fog
Junior legal assistant
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Legal advisor
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Junior legal advisor
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor