Do strikes constitute extraordinary circumstances?
In Scandinavia, focus in the passing weeks has been on labour disputes in the aviation sector. Cabin crew at a major Scandinavian airline went on strike for several days and pilots at another Scandinavian airline have ceased work. Here, we provide our evaluation of whether passengers are entitled to compensation when their flights get cancelled or delayed due to labour disputes.
The strikes in the aviation sector for the passing weeks have resulted in a massive amount of delays and cancellations of scheduled departures, and the airlines have suffered huge losses. This raises a lot of questions relating to the EU-Regulation 261, including whether the passengers are entitled to compensation when labour disputes cause their flights to be cancelled or delayed. The views differ in the media and between different authorities – here we provide our evaluation of these cases.
In general, passengers are entitled to compensation if the flight is cancelled or delayed by three hours or more. The airline is only exempt from liability if the airline proves that the delay / cancellation was caused by extraordinary circumstances (EOC) and that the circumstances could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
The legal position in Denmark
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has not yet decided whether labour disputes are qualified as EOC and thus the question must be handled based on national case law and the preamble of the regulation.
In Denmark, the Eastern High Court handed down a judgment regarding this matter a few years ago, in which the court ruled in favour of the airline. The court found that the labour dispute constituted an EOC and that the airline had done everything within their power to avoid the cancellation; e.g. by trying to lease a substituting aircraft. However, the court stressed that this depends on an individual assessment in each case.
Thus, the legal position in Denmark is that labour disputes may constitute an EOC – especially if the strike contravenes with the collective agreement. But even if the strike has been announced according to the agreement, it may still be considered an EOC. This was what applied in the above-mentioned case – and even though the labour dispute was commenced by the airline (lockout of employees, not a strike), it was considered an EOC. With regards to this judgment, EOC seems to have a wide scope in relation to labour disputes. This is supported by the fact that strikes are mentioned in the preamble to the regulation as a possible EOC.
However, even if the strike is considered an EOC, airlines should keep in mind that it is a condition for compensation exemption that all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid the cancellation / delay, e.g. by trying to acquire crew from other sources or to lease aircrafts including crew from a subcontractor.
In summary
Claims for compensation originating from delays or cancellations caused by labour disputes should be evaluated thoroughly. In our opinion, strikes probably constitute an EOC under Danish law, and if the airline has taken all reasonable measures to avoid the delay / cancellation, our general advice would be to reject claims for compensation. However, the right to compensation is according to case law dependent on an individual assessment of each case and such evaluation must therefore always be made.
The strikes in the aviation sector for the passing weeks have resulted in a massive amount of delays and cancellations of scheduled departures, and the airlines have suffered huge losses. This raises a lot of questions relating to the EU-Regulation 261, including whether the passengers are entitled to compensation when labour disputes cause their flights to be cancelled or delayed. The views differ in the media and between different authorities – here we provide our evaluation of these cases.
In general, passengers are entitled to compensation if the flight is cancelled or delayed by three hours or more. The airline is only exempt from liability if the airline proves that the delay / cancellation was caused by extraordinary circumstances (EOC) and that the circumstances could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
The legal position in Denmark
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has not yet decided whether labour disputes are qualified as EOC and thus the question must be handled based on national case law and the preamble of the regulation.
In Denmark, the Eastern High Court handed down a judgment regarding this matter a few years ago, in which the court ruled in favour of the airline. The court found that the labour dispute constituted an EOC and that the airline had done everything within their power to avoid the cancellation; e.g. by trying to lease a substituting aircraft. However, the court stressed that this depends on an individual assessment in each case.
Thus, the legal position in Denmark is that labour disputes may constitute an EOC – especially if the strike contravenes with the collective agreement. But even if the strike has been announced according to the agreement, it may still be considered an EOC. This was what applied in the above-mentioned case – and even though the labour dispute was commenced by the airline (lockout of employees, not a strike), it was considered an EOC. With regards to this judgment, EOC seems to have a wide scope in relation to labour disputes. This is supported by the fact that strikes are mentioned in the preamble to the regulation as a possible EOC.
However, even if the strike is considered an EOC, airlines should keep in mind that it is a condition for compensation exemption that all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid the cancellation / delay, e.g. by trying to acquire crew from other sources or to lease aircrafts including crew from a subcontractor.
In summary
Claims for compensation originating from delays or cancellations caused by labour disputes should be evaluated thoroughly. In our opinion, strikes probably constitute an EOC under Danish law, and if the airline has taken all reasonable measures to avoid the delay / cancellation, our general advice would be to reject claims for compensation. However, the right to compensation is according to case law dependent on an individual assessment of each case and such evaluation must therefore always be made.
Receive our newsletter
![](/media/22673/siddende_2016.png)
Aage
Krogh
PartnerSimilar
The team
![](/media/22673/siddende_2016.png)
Aage
Krogh
Partner![](/media/1973/siddende_sort.png)
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Legal assistant![](/media/29528/amalie_siddende_2023.png)
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Legal advisor![](/media/23704/amalie_siddende_2023.png)
Amalie
Sofie Sveen Kvam
Legal assistant![](/media/29532/amanda_siddende_2023.png)
Amanda
Jepsen Bregnhardt
Legal assistant![](/media/29499/andrea_siddende_2023.png)
Andrea
Brix Danielsen
Legal advisor![](/media/23097/anna_siddende_2023.png)
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor![](/media/25910/anna_siddende_2023.png)
Anna
Kreutzmann
Senior legal assistant![](/media/23359/anne_siddende_2023.png)
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant![](/media/23052/anton_siddende_2023.png)
Anton
Winther Hansen
Legal advisor![](/media/29503/ashley_siddende_2023.png)
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Benedicte
Rodian
Senior legal assistant![](/media/17880/bror_siddende_2021.png)
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor![](/media/15171/chris_siddende_2020.png)
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor![](/media/29536/cille_siddende_2023.png)
Cille
Fahnø
Senior legal assistant![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Legal assistant![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Legal assistant![](/media/22203/elvira_siddende_2022.png)
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor![](/media/29540/ema_siddende_2023.png)
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Junior legal advisor![](/media/29565/emma_siddende_2023.png)
Emma
Engvang Hansen
Legal assistant![](/media/17930/emma_siddende_2021.png)
Emma
Frøslev Larsen
Legal manager![](/media/20082/fransine_siddende_2022.png)
Fransine
Andersson
Legal advisor![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Frederikke
Kirkegaard Thalund
Legal assistant![](/media/23367/frederikke_siddende_2023.png)
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Frida
Aas Ahlquist
Legal assistant![](/media/21173/frida_siddende_2022.png)
Frida
Assarson
Legal advisor![](/media/25960/gustav_siddende_2023.png)
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant![](/media/30441/hanna_siddende_2024.png)
Hanna
Honerød Augestad
Junior legal advisor![](/media/23066/isabella_siddende_2023.png)
Isabella
Rocio Nielsen
Junior legal advisor![](/media/25970/johanne_siddende_2023.png)
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant![](/media/29625/kaisa_siddende_2023.png)
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Junior legal advisor![](/media/1973/siddende_sort.png)
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Legal assistant![](/media/29629/karoline_siddende_2023.png)
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Legal manager![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Karoline
Nordved
Legal assistant![](/media/29637/laura_siddende_2023.png)
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor![](/media/1973/siddende_sort.png)
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Junior legal advisor![](/media/15730/maya_siddende_2020.png)
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor![](/media/22237/mie_siddende_2022.png)
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Legal manager![](/media/23526/rosa_siddende_2023.png)
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor![](/media/24684/selma_siddende_2023.png)
Selma
Agopian
Senior EU associate![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Junior legal advisor![](/media/1978/siddende_pige.png)
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Junior legal advisor![](/media/29653/sille_siddende_2023.png)
Sille
Lyng Mejding
Legal advisor![](/media/26081/simone_siddende_2023.png)
Simone
Bjergskov Nielsen
Senior legal assistant![](/media/29657/sofija_siddende_2023.png)
Sofija
Cabrilo
Legal assistant![](/media/10370/sophia_siddende_2019.png)
Sophia
Maria Dahl-Jensen
Senior legal advisor![](/media/26084/stine_siddende_2023.png)