Proof of payment
After a cancelled flight, a group of passengers and an air carrier disagreed on whether the air carrier had issued a refund. It is usually up to the air carrier to prove that the payment has happened, but in a recent ruling, the Danish Eastern High Court made it clear that the burden of proof is not always the air carrier’s alone.
Share video
A group of air passengers had their flight cancelled. The passengers demanded a refund for their plane tickets, but the air carrier claimed they had already been refunded. The transfer had been made to the same payment card used to purchase the tickets.
Responsibility for documentation
The Danish Eastern High Court decided that the passengers were responsible for proving the lack of refund, especially since the air carrier had already presented documentation that they had completed the transfer. Therefore, the passengers could not simply deny receiving the payment, and the Court found that a refund had occurred.
The Court emphasized that the air carrier had transferred the amount to the original payment card and that they could refer to several printouts from their internal system. The Court also highlighted that the air carrier had encouraged the passengers to contact their bank to locate the payment. However, the passengers never did so.
IUNO’s opinion
The case demonstrates that it is the passengers’ responsibility to document that they have not received a refund if the air carrier has presented evidence to the contrary.
IUNO recommends that air carriers consider this ruling when a passenger denies receiving a refund. The ruling indicates that it may be sufficient for the air carrier to prove that a refund has been made to the card used by the passengers for payment. This has significant practical implications, as refunds for plane tickets usually occur automatically.
[Eastern High Court judgment of January 26, 2024, in case BS-40185/2023-OLR]
A group of air passengers had their flight cancelled. The passengers demanded a refund for their plane tickets, but the air carrier claimed they had already been refunded. The transfer had been made to the same payment card used to purchase the tickets.
Responsibility for documentation
The Danish Eastern High Court decided that the passengers were responsible for proving the lack of refund, especially since the air carrier had already presented documentation that they had completed the transfer. Therefore, the passengers could not simply deny receiving the payment, and the Court found that a refund had occurred.
The Court emphasized that the air carrier had transferred the amount to the original payment card and that they could refer to several printouts from their internal system. The Court also highlighted that the air carrier had encouraged the passengers to contact their bank to locate the payment. However, the passengers never did so.
IUNO’s opinion
The case demonstrates that it is the passengers’ responsibility to document that they have not received a refund if the air carrier has presented evidence to the contrary.
IUNO recommends that air carriers consider this ruling when a passenger denies receiving a refund. The ruling indicates that it may be sufficient for the air carrier to prove that a refund has been made to the card used by the passengers for payment. This has significant practical implications, as refunds for plane tickets usually occur automatically.
[Eastern High Court judgment of January 26, 2024, in case BS-40185/2023-OLR]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Andrea
Brix Danielsen
Legal advisor
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Junior legal advisor
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Benedicte
Rodian
Senior legal assistant
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilia
Naledi Madonsela Mikkelsen
Legal assistant
Emma
Engvang Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal advisor
Frederikke
Kirkegaard Thalund
Senior legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Junior legal advisor
Frida
Aas Ahlquist
Senior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Junior legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Legal assistant
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Jacqueline
Lucia Chrillesen
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Legal advisor
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nanna
Damkjær
Junior legal advsior
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Junior legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Legal assistant