Staff shortages in baggage handling can be an extraordinary circumstance
A flight was delayed due to staff shortages during the process of loading baggage. The European Court of Justice ruled that this situation can be an extraordinary circumstance. However, the airline must be able to prove that the delay could not have been avoided even if they had taken all reasonable measures.
Share video
A flight was delayed by more than three hours. The delay was mainly caused by the fact that it took a long time to load luggage onto the aircraft due to a lack of staff. The European Court of Justice had to decide whether the lack of staff at the airport operator who was responsible for loading baggage could be considered an extraordinary circumstance.
Different service provider - reasonable measure?
The European Court of Justice ruled that staff shortages at airport operators can constitute an extraordinary circumstance. To avoid compensating passengers, the airline must demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable no matter what measures they took.
In this case, as a reasonable measure, the airline could have used another service provider with enough capacity to provide the service without delay.
IUNO's opinion
The case shows that delays due to staff shortages when loading baggage can constitute an extraordinary circumstance and exempt the airline from paying compensation - if all reasonable measures have been taken.
IUNO recommends that airlines investigate the possibility of using other providers when facing delays due to staff shortages during baggage loading. However, in many cases, this is not possible for practical reasons. For example, when only one or a few ground-handling companies are present at the airport. In addition, in strike situations, it is forbidden to use another service provider to compensate for staff shortages at the provider. In those cases, there are fewer requirements for when all reasonable measures have been taken.
[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 May 2024 in case C-405/23]
A flight was delayed by more than three hours. The delay was mainly caused by the fact that it took a long time to load luggage onto the aircraft due to a lack of staff. The European Court of Justice had to decide whether the lack of staff at the airport operator who was responsible for loading baggage could be considered an extraordinary circumstance.
Different service provider - reasonable measure?
The European Court of Justice ruled that staff shortages at airport operators can constitute an extraordinary circumstance. To avoid compensating passengers, the airline must demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable no matter what measures they took.
In this case, as a reasonable measure, the airline could have used another service provider with enough capacity to provide the service without delay.
IUNO's opinion
The case shows that delays due to staff shortages when loading baggage can constitute an extraordinary circumstance and exempt the airline from paying compensation - if all reasonable measures have been taken.
IUNO recommends that airlines investigate the possibility of using other providers when facing delays due to staff shortages during baggage loading. However, in many cases, this is not possible for practical reasons. For example, when only one or a few ground-handling companies are present at the airport. In addition, in strike situations, it is forbidden to use another service provider to compensate for staff shortages at the provider. In those cases, there are fewer requirements for when all reasonable measures have been taken.
[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 May 2024 in case C-405/23]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Andrea
Brix Danielsen
Legal advisor
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Junior legal advisor
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Benedicte
Rodian
Senior legal assistant
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilia
Naledi Madonsela Mikkelsen
Legal assistant
Emma
Engvang Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal advisor
Frederikke
Kirkegaard Thalund
Senior legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Junior legal advisor
Frida
Aas Ahlquist
Senior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Junior legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Legal assistant
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Jacqueline
Lucia Chrillesen
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Legal advisor
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nanna
Damkjær
Junior legal advsior
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Junior legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Legal assistant