EN
Aviation

Technical problems at the terminal constitutes an extraordinary circumstance

logo
Legal news
calendar 18 January 2019
globus Denmark

The German Federal Court has recently ruled that technical problems at the airport terminal can constitute an extraordinary circumstance, thereby ruling that five passengers were not entitled to compensation from the carrier.

According to EC Regulation 261/2004 on compensation and assistance to passengers, airline passengers are entitled to compensation up to 600 EUR from the carrier in case of cancellations and delays over three hours.

However, carriers are not obliged to compensate the passenger if the cancellation or delay is due to extraordinary circumstances. Even though EC Regulation 261/2004 is nearly 15 years old, it is still unclear what exactly constitutes an extraordinary circumstance.

The German Federal Court has with a new ruling brought us one step closer to understanding the term. The court has passed a ruling in a case, where five passengers claimed 600 EUR in compensation for a 19-hour delay that was caused by a technical disruption. The court ruled that the carrier was not obliged to pay compensation, because it found that unforeseeable technical problems constitute an extraordinary circumstance.

The court further ruled, that the monitoring, maintenance, and repair of technical facilities do not fall within the carrier’s responsibility and that carriers are not obliged to provide its own specialists to maintain computer systems provided by the airport.

IUNO’s opinion

The ruling helps to gain a better understanding of the carrier’s duties to take reasonable measure and of what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance. IUNO’s opinion is that it is still unclear what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance and that there is a need for a clarification from EU on the matter.

IUNO will, amongst other things, discuss the ruling at our seminar January 22, 2019. You can sign up for the seminar here.

According to EC Regulation 261/2004 on compensation and assistance to passengers, airline passengers are entitled to compensation up to 600 EUR from the carrier in case of cancellations and delays over three hours.

However, carriers are not obliged to compensate the passenger if the cancellation or delay is due to extraordinary circumstances. Even though EC Regulation 261/2004 is nearly 15 years old, it is still unclear what exactly constitutes an extraordinary circumstance.

The German Federal Court has with a new ruling brought us one step closer to understanding the term. The court has passed a ruling in a case, where five passengers claimed 600 EUR in compensation for a 19-hour delay that was caused by a technical disruption. The court ruled that the carrier was not obliged to pay compensation, because it found that unforeseeable technical problems constitute an extraordinary circumstance.

The court further ruled, that the monitoring, maintenance, and repair of technical facilities do not fall within the carrier’s responsibility and that carriers are not obliged to provide its own specialists to maintain computer systems provided by the airport.

IUNO’s opinion

The ruling helps to gain a better understanding of the carrier’s duties to take reasonable measure and of what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance. IUNO’s opinion is that it is still unclear what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance and that there is a need for a clarification from EU on the matter.

IUNO will, amongst other things, discuss the ruling at our seminar January 22, 2019. You can sign up for the seminar here.

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Similar

logo
Aviation

26 May 2025

Claims for compensation and interest must be sent to the correct email address

logo
Aviation

22 April 2025

Regulation 261/2004 does not cover helicopter transport

logo
Aviation

18 February 2025

A passenger’s own rebooking did not grant compensation

logo
Aviation

22 January 2025

Internal documentation was sufficient

logo
Aviation

18 December 2024

Sweden to abolish aviation tax

logo
Aviation

11 December 2024

ICAO raises airline liability limits

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Junior legal advisor

Albert

Berg Giese

Legal assistant

Albert

Vestergaard Mogensen

Junior legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Senior legal advisor

Anna

Bonander

Legal advisor

Anna

Ferguson Bille-Biggart

Junior legal advisor

Anna

Kreutzmann

Legal manager

Anna

Laura Brohl Larsen

Legal assistant

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Senior legal assistant

Anton

Winther Hansen

Senior legal advisor

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Senior legal advisor

Asla

Tui Casey Belusa

Junior legal assistant

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Associate

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Caroline

Sofie Urup Malmstrøm

Senior legal assistant

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Legal advisor

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal advisor

Daniela

Zaragoza-Schultz

Junior legal assistant

Ea

Tingkær Hesselfeldt

Legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Junior legal advisor

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Senior legal advisor

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Legal advisor

Emilie

Mehl Bagger

Legal assistant

Emily

Mortensen

Junior legal assistant

Feline

Honoré Jepsen

Legal assistant

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Senior legal assistant

Freja

Pedersen

Legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Associate

Gustav

Vestergaard

Senior legal assistant

Holger

Koch-Klarskov

Legal advisor

Ian

Englev Jensen

Legal assistant

Ida

Marie Skovgaard Rubæk

Senior legal manager

Isabella

Fjording

Legal assistant

Izabell

Celina Bastrup Lüthje

Senior legal assistant

Johanne

Alberte Liljeborg

Junior legal advisor

Julia

Wolfe

Legal advisor

Kaisa

Maria Falkenberg Lending

Junior legal advisor

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Senior legal advisor

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Senior legal manager

Kateryna

Buriak

Legal advisor

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Luna

Bennesen

Legal assistant

Marie

Møller Christensen

Legal advisor

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Senior legal advisor

Mathias

Rex Brohus

Legal assistant

Mathilde

Bjørn Bjerring

Legal assistant

Mathilde

Stenderup

Legal assistant

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Merle

Frisendahl Fog

Legal assistant

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Legal advisor

Najat

Ibrahim

Junior legal assistant

Nourchaine

Sellami

Legal advisor

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Legal advisor

Selma

Agopian

Senior Associate, EU-advokat

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Legal advisor

Silja

Brünnich Fogh von Deden

Senior legal assistant

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal advisor

Simon

Saaby-Lamer

Junior legal assistant

Thilde

Zwicki Meulengracht

Junior legal assistant

Victoria

Mai Gregaard Handberg

Legal advisor

Viktoria

Eline Hegelund

Senior legal assistant