Technical problems at the terminal constitutes an extraordinary circumstance
The German Federal Court has recently ruled that technical problems at the airport terminal can constitute an extraordinary circumstance, thereby ruling that five passengers were not entitled to compensation from the carrier.
According to EC Regulation 261/2004 on compensation and assistance to passengers, airline passengers are entitled to compensation up to 600 EUR from the carrier in case of cancellations and delays over three hours.
However, carriers are not obliged to compensate the passenger if the cancellation or delay is due to extraordinary circumstances. Even though EC Regulation 261/2004 is nearly 15 years old, it is still unclear what exactly constitutes an extraordinary circumstance.
The German Federal Court has with a new ruling brought us one step closer to understanding the term. The court has passed a ruling in a case, where five passengers claimed 600 EUR in compensation for a 19-hour delay that was caused by a technical disruption. The court ruled that the carrier was not obliged to pay compensation, because it found that unforeseeable technical problems constitute an extraordinary circumstance.
The court further ruled, that the monitoring, maintenance, and repair of technical facilities do not fall within the carrier’s responsibility and that carriers are not obliged to provide its own specialists to maintain computer systems provided by the airport.
IUNO’s opinion
The ruling helps to gain a better understanding of the carrier’s duties to take reasonable measure and of what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance. IUNO’s opinion is that it is still unclear what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance and that there is a need for a clarification from EU on the matter.
IUNO will, amongst other things, discuss the ruling at our seminar January 22, 2019. You can sign up for the seminar here.
According to EC Regulation 261/2004 on compensation and assistance to passengers, airline passengers are entitled to compensation up to 600 EUR from the carrier in case of cancellations and delays over three hours.
However, carriers are not obliged to compensate the passenger if the cancellation or delay is due to extraordinary circumstances. Even though EC Regulation 261/2004 is nearly 15 years old, it is still unclear what exactly constitutes an extraordinary circumstance.
The German Federal Court has with a new ruling brought us one step closer to understanding the term. The court has passed a ruling in a case, where five passengers claimed 600 EUR in compensation for a 19-hour delay that was caused by a technical disruption. The court ruled that the carrier was not obliged to pay compensation, because it found that unforeseeable technical problems constitute an extraordinary circumstance.
The court further ruled, that the monitoring, maintenance, and repair of technical facilities do not fall within the carrier’s responsibility and that carriers are not obliged to provide its own specialists to maintain computer systems provided by the airport.
IUNO’s opinion
The ruling helps to gain a better understanding of the carrier’s duties to take reasonable measure and of what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance. IUNO’s opinion is that it is still unclear what constitutes an extraordinary circumstance and that there is a need for a clarification from EU on the matter.
IUNO will, amongst other things, discuss the ruling at our seminar January 22, 2019. You can sign up for the seminar here.
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Legal assistant
Amalie
Sofie Sveen Kvam
Legal assistant
Amanda
Jepsen Bregnhardt
Junior legal assistant
Andrea
Brix Danielsen
Legal assistant
Anna
Bonander
Legal assistant
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal assistant
Anne
Poulsen
Senior legal advisor
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Legal assistant
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal assistant
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Carl-Emil
Schumann Dinesen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Skarsø Erwolter
Legal assistant
Cecilie
Padbjerg Kjelstrup
Legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal assistant
Emma
Engvang Hansen
Legal assistant
Emma
Frøslev Larsen
Legal manager
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal assistant
Frederik
Dybro Mikkelsen
Junior legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Senior legal assistant
Gabrielle
Marie Rokkjær
Legal assistant
Gustav
Vestergaard
Legal assistant
Hila
Noori Hashimi
Legal assistant
Ida
Ralfkiær Rask
Legal assistant
Ingrid
Lützner Buch
Legal assistant
Isabella
Graae Norsker
Legal assistant
Isabella
Rocio Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ittqa
Hussain
Legal assistant
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Legal assistant
Josephine
Thenning Kannegaard
Junior legal assistant
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Junior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Legal assistant
Kathrine
Arntzen Lauvstad
Junior legal assistant
Laura
Jørgensen
Legal assistant
Lise
Jørgen Carlsen Gjerde
Associate
Liva
Tværmose Høegh
Legal assistant
Magnus
Henckel Holtse
Legal assistant
Marie
Langermann-Nielsen
Legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Legal manager
Nikoline
Lanzky Otto
Legal assistant
Peter
Basbøll
Legal assistant
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal assistant
Selma
Agopian
Senior EU associate
Sille
Lyng Mejding
Legal assistant
Simone
Bjergskov Nielsen
Legal assistant
Sofie
Storli
Legal assistant
Sofija
Cabrilo
Legal assistant
Sophia
Maria Dahl-Jensen
Senior legal advisor