EN
Aviation

The CJEU: Collision with foreign objects an extraordinary circumstance

logo
Legal news
calendar 24 October 2019
globus Denmark, Sweden, Norway

In a recent ruling, The European Court of Justice (CJEU) declared that damage to an aircraft tyre caused by a foreign object, such as screws in this case, falls within the notion of ‘extraordinary circumstances’. Therefore, air carriers are not, according to art 7 in the 261/204, obliged to pay compensation to passengers in these situations.

Passengers are entitled to compensation if the flight is more than three hours delayed, unless the event which caused the delay is not considered an ‘extraordinary circumstance’. Circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.

The case involved a passenger who had booked a flight from Dublin to Düsseldorf with Germanwings. The flight was delayed for 3 hours and 28 minutes due to a screw in a tyre that was found during the preparations for take-off which meant the tyre needed to be changed.

Due to the delay, the passenger claimed 250 euro in compensation in accordance with art 7 of regulation 261/2004. Germanwings refused to pay compensation because the delay of the flight in question was due to ‘extraordinary circumstances’.

At first, Amtsgericht Köln (Local Court, Cologne, Germany) held that the reason for the delay constituted a circumstance which is inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of an air carrier, thus, inside of their actual control and not under the notion of extraordinary circumstances. The court ruled for Germanwings to pay the plaintiff 250 euro in compensation for the delay.

Germanwings contested that the screw in the tyre was within their control as they argued that it can impossibly be an assessment of air carriers to clean the runways from foreign objects, this should be within the scope of the airport, and not the air carrier.

Consequently, Germanwings brought an appeal against that decision before the Landgericht Köln (Regional Court, Cologne). The court requested in turn for a preliminary ruling in order to achieve clarity of whether this situation is to be considered as an extraordinary circumstance or not.

The CJEU acknowledge the strict demands on air carriers regarding regular safety as an everyday operating procedure.

However, the obligation is not limitless and CJEU found that damage to an aircraft tyre caused by a foreign object, such as loose screws, falls within the notion of ‘extraordinary circumstances’. Germanwings was, therefore, not obliged to pay compensation to the passenger if they can prove it deployed all its resources in order to avoid the changing of a tyre damaged by a foreign object.

IUNO’s opinion

The compensation responsibility would be too comprehensive if it was air carriers’ obligation to clean the runways. Cleaning and clearing the airport runway is to be attributed to general air traffic and not to the specific tasks of an air carrier. However, it is currently unclear exactly how Danish and Swedish law will react to CJEU’s judgment. We will closely follow future cases concerning the interpretation of extraordinary circumstances and report relevant information further on.

(European court of justice ruling of 4th of April 2019 C‑501/17)

Passengers are entitled to compensation if the flight is more than three hours delayed, unless the event which caused the delay is not considered an ‘extraordinary circumstance’. Circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.

The case involved a passenger who had booked a flight from Dublin to Düsseldorf with Germanwings. The flight was delayed for 3 hours and 28 minutes due to a screw in a tyre that was found during the preparations for take-off which meant the tyre needed to be changed.

Due to the delay, the passenger claimed 250 euro in compensation in accordance with art 7 of regulation 261/2004. Germanwings refused to pay compensation because the delay of the flight in question was due to ‘extraordinary circumstances’.

At first, Amtsgericht Köln (Local Court, Cologne, Germany) held that the reason for the delay constituted a circumstance which is inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of an air carrier, thus, inside of their actual control and not under the notion of extraordinary circumstances. The court ruled for Germanwings to pay the plaintiff 250 euro in compensation for the delay.

Germanwings contested that the screw in the tyre was within their control as they argued that it can impossibly be an assessment of air carriers to clean the runways from foreign objects, this should be within the scope of the airport, and not the air carrier.

Consequently, Germanwings brought an appeal against that decision before the Landgericht Köln (Regional Court, Cologne). The court requested in turn for a preliminary ruling in order to achieve clarity of whether this situation is to be considered as an extraordinary circumstance or not.

The CJEU acknowledge the strict demands on air carriers regarding regular safety as an everyday operating procedure.

However, the obligation is not limitless and CJEU found that damage to an aircraft tyre caused by a foreign object, such as loose screws, falls within the notion of ‘extraordinary circumstances’. Germanwings was, therefore, not obliged to pay compensation to the passenger if they can prove it deployed all its resources in order to avoid the changing of a tyre damaged by a foreign object.

IUNO’s opinion

The compensation responsibility would be too comprehensive if it was air carriers’ obligation to clean the runways. Cleaning and clearing the airport runway is to be attributed to general air traffic and not to the specific tasks of an air carrier. However, it is currently unclear exactly how Danish and Swedish law will react to CJEU’s judgment. We will closely follow future cases concerning the interpretation of extraordinary circumstances and report relevant information further on.

(European court of justice ruling of 4th of April 2019 C‑501/17)

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Similar

logo
Aviation

10 April 2024

Refund through travel agency

logo
Aviation

20 March 2024

Six-hour delay in sight – no compensation

logo
Aviation

26 February 2024

Cancelled tickets resulted in denied boarding

logo
Aviation

16 February 2024

Automatic rebooking system recognised as a reasonable precaution

logo
Aviation

25 May 2022

Air carriers are not obligated to refund fees charged by ticket providers

logo
Aviation

4 May 2022

Despite several days' notice, a strike counted as an extraordinary circumstance

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Junior legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Legal assistant

Amalie

Sofie Sveen Kvam

Legal assistant

Amanda

Jepsen Bregnhardt

Legal assistant

Andrea

Brix Danielsen

Legal assistant

Anna

Bonander

Senior legal assistant

Anna

Kreutzmann

Senior legal assistant

Anne

Poulsen

Senior legal advisor

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Senior legal assistant

Anton

Winther Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Legal assistant

Benedicte

Rodian

Junior legal assistant

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Carl-Emil

Schumann Dinesen

Senior legal advisor

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Senior legal assistant

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Junior legal assistant

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Legal advisor (on leave)

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Senior legal assistant

Emma

Engvang Hansen

Legal assistant

Emma

Frøslev Larsen

Legal manager

Fransine

Andersson

Senior legal assistant

Frederik

Dybro Mikkelsen

Legal assistant

Frederikke

Kirkegaard Thalund

Junior legal assistant

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Senior legal assistant

Frida

Aas Ahlquist

Junior legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Legal advisor

Gustav

Vestergaard

Legal assistant

Hanna

Honerød Augestad

Legal assistant

Ida

Ralfkiær Rask

Legal assistant

Isabella

Graae Norsker

Legal assistant

Isabella

Rocio Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Johanne

Berner Nielsen

Legal assistant

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Legal assistant

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Junior legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Legal manager

Karoline

Nordved

Junior legal assistant

Kathrine

Arntzen Lauvstad

Legal assistant

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Liva

Tværmose Høegh

Senior legal assistant

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Junior legal assistant

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Legal manager (on leave)

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Senior legal assistant

Selma

Agopian

Senior EU associate

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Junior legal assistant

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal assistant

Sille

Lyng Mejding

Legal assistant

Simone

Bjergskov Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Sofija

Cabrilo

Legal assistant

Sophia

Maria Dahl-Jensen

Senior legal advisor

Stine

Bank Olstrøm

Legal assistant