How to win Court Cases concerning regulation 261/2004 without an oral hearing
Read this document to get valuable information on procedures, evidence and the latest case law regarding EC Regulation 261/2004. All it takes is a IUNO+ subscription.
Document
This is a document. If you have a IUNO+ subscription you can open the document and read it over and over. Just click on "Open document" to get started.
If you want to hear more about IUNO+, please contact us on IUNOplus@iuno.law.
Focus
The vast majority of disputes regarding EC Regulation 261/2004 are decided on a written basis, i.e. without an oral hearing. Therefore, it is important for air carriers to be able to present the essential evidence. However, this requires that air carriers internally have procedures in place that will secure the collection of relevant evidence when a delay or a cancellation occur.
But what evidence is relevant? And exactly what does it take to win a case on a written basis? These are the questions we will look into, in connection with our upcoming seminar the 28th of January 2020.
Just in the last months of 2019, IUNO won around 30 court cases on a written basis. At the seminar, we will share our experiences about what evidence it is necessary to present to lift the burden of proof and thereby to win the case.
Furthermore, we will also be looking at the latest case court cases and developments regarding EC Regulation 261/2004.
Document
This is a document. If you have a IUNO+ subscription you can open the document and read it over and over. Just click on "Open document" to get started.
If you want to hear more about IUNO+, please contact us on IUNOplus@iuno.law.
Focus
The vast majority of disputes regarding EC Regulation 261/2004 are decided on a written basis, i.e. without an oral hearing. Therefore, it is important for air carriers to be able to present the essential evidence. However, this requires that air carriers internally have procedures in place that will secure the collection of relevant evidence when a delay or a cancellation occur.
But what evidence is relevant? And exactly what does it take to win a case on a written basis? These are the questions we will look into, in connection with our upcoming seminar the 28th of January 2020.
Just in the last months of 2019, IUNO won around 30 court cases on a written basis. At the seminar, we will share our experiences about what evidence it is necessary to present to lift the burden of proof and thereby to win the case.
Furthermore, we will also be looking at the latest case court cases and developments regarding EC Regulation 261/2004.

Aage
Krogh
PartnerSimilar
Whistleblower schemes in the Nordic region
Whistleblower schemes in the Nordic region
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Anne
Poulsen
Senior legal assistant
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Legal assistant
Carl-Emil
Schumann Dinesen
Legal assistant
Caroline
Bruun Ibsen
Senior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Clara
Andersen Øfeldt
Senior legal assistant
Clara
Löfgren
Legal assistant
Ellen
Thorn Ekstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Emma
Frøslev Larsen
Legal Manager
Fransine
Andersson
Legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Legal assistant
Hila
Noori Hashimi
Legal assistant
Ingrid
Nordgård Kvaal
Senior legal assistant
Julie
Aagaard Thomsen
Senior legal assistant
Kathrine
Münter
Senior legal assistant
Kathrine
Wohlers Sørensen
Legal assistant
Kirstine
Damkjær Nielsen
Legal Advisor
Line
Ponton Nemeth
Legal assistant
Luna
Hjelmen Dannemann Lundgren
Junior legal assistant
Malene
Ougaard Sørensen
Legal Advisor
Mathias
Jul Soursou
Junior legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal assistant
Mikkel
Løve Ekstrand
Legal assistant
Rasmine
Laguna Kristensen
Legal Advisor
Selma
Agopian
EU Lawyer
Siri
Agnete Bennekou
Legal assistant
Sol
Marie Ronæs
Legal assistant
Sophia
Maria Dahl-Jensen
Legal Advisor