Regulation 261/2004 does not cover helicopter transport
A new judgment from the Copenhagen City Court confirms that Regulation 261/2004 does not apply to air travel involving both fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters.
Two passengers claimed compensation after part of their flight was cancelled. The cancelled segment was supposed to be operated by helicopter. The key question in the case became whether helicopter transport, as part of an overall flight journey, is covered by Regulation 261/2004.
When a journey consists of several flights, the journey must be completed with a directly connecting fixed-wing aircraft to be covered by the regulation. The Copenhagen City Court found that helicopters cannot be considered "fixed-wing aircraft" under the regulation.
The court also emphasised that no evidence suggested that the passengers were unaware that the final part of the journey would be conducted by helicopter. Therefore, the case was dismissed.
IUNO’s opinion
The case shows that helicopter transport cannot constitute a direct flight connection under Regulation 261/2004. This is why airlines are not required to pay compensation if they cancel the part of the journey intended to be operated by helicopter.
However, IUNO recommends that airlines inform passengers if any part of the flight will be conducted by helicopter. It may prove crucial whether passengers were aware of this.
[Copenhagen City Court judgment of 11 October 2024 in case BS-5207/2023-KBH]
Two passengers claimed compensation after part of their flight was cancelled. The cancelled segment was supposed to be operated by helicopter. The key question in the case became whether helicopter transport, as part of an overall flight journey, is covered by Regulation 261/2004.
When a journey consists of several flights, the journey must be completed with a directly connecting fixed-wing aircraft to be covered by the regulation. The Copenhagen City Court found that helicopters cannot be considered "fixed-wing aircraft" under the regulation.
The court also emphasised that no evidence suggested that the passengers were unaware that the final part of the journey would be conducted by helicopter. Therefore, the case was dismissed.
IUNO’s opinion
The case shows that helicopter transport cannot constitute a direct flight connection under Regulation 261/2004. This is why airlines are not required to pay compensation if they cancel the part of the journey intended to be operated by helicopter.
However, IUNO recommends that airlines inform passengers if any part of the flight will be conducted by helicopter. It may prove crucial whether passengers were aware of this.
[Copenhagen City Court judgment of 11 October 2024 in case BS-5207/2023-KBH]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Junior legal advisor
Albert
Berg Giese
Legal assistant
Albert
Vestergaard Mogensen
Junior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Andrea
Liva Lyngbye-Ottesen
Junior legal assistant
Andreas
Odgaard Christensen
Junior legal assistant
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Ferguson Bille-Biggart
Junior legal advisor
Anna
Laura Brohl Larsen
Legal assistant
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Senior legal advisor
Asla
Tui Casey Belusa
Junior legal assistant
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal advisor
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniela
Zaragoza-Schultz
Junior legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Junior legal advisor
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilie
Mehl Bagger
Legal assistant
Emily
Mortensen
Junior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Freja
Pedersen
Legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Senior legal manager
Isabella
Fjording
Legal assistant
Johanne
Alberte Liljeborg
Junior legal advisor
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal advisor
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Senior legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal assistant
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Senior legal advisor
Mathias
Rex Brohus
Legal assistant
Mathilde
Bjørn Bjerring
Legal assistant
Mathilde
Stenderup
Legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Merle
Frisendahl Fog
Legal assistant
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Legal advisor
Najat
Ibrahim
Junior legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Senior legal advisor
Simon
Saaby-Lamer
Junior legal assistant
Thilde
Zwicki Meulengracht
Junior legal assistant
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor