Staff shortages in baggage handling can be an extraordinary circumstance
A flight was delayed due to staff shortages during the process of loading baggage. The European Court of Justice ruled that this situation can be an extraordinary circumstance. However, the airline must be able to prove that the delay could not have been avoided even if they had taken all reasonable measures.
Share video
A flight was delayed by more than three hours. The delay was mainly caused by the fact that it took a long time to load luggage onto the aircraft due to a lack of staff. The European Court of Justice had to decide whether the lack of staff at the airport operator who was responsible for loading baggage could be considered an extraordinary circumstance.
Different service provider - reasonable measure?
The European Court of Justice ruled that staff shortages at airport operators can constitute an extraordinary circumstance. To avoid compensating passengers, the airline must demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable no matter what measures they took.
In this case, as a reasonable measure, the airline could have used another service provider with enough capacity to provide the service without delay.
IUNO's opinion
The case shows that delays due to staff shortages when loading baggage can constitute an extraordinary circumstance and exempt the airline from paying compensation - if all reasonable measures have been taken.
IUNO recommends that airlines investigate the possibility of using other providers when facing delays due to staff shortages during baggage loading. However, in many cases, this is not possible for practical reasons. For example, when only one or a few ground-handling companies are present at the airport. In addition, in strike situations, it is forbidden to use another service provider to compensate for staff shortages at the provider. In those cases, there are fewer requirements for when all reasonable measures have been taken.
[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 May 2024 in case C-405/23]
A flight was delayed by more than three hours. The delay was mainly caused by the fact that it took a long time to load luggage onto the aircraft due to a lack of staff. The European Court of Justice had to decide whether the lack of staff at the airport operator who was responsible for loading baggage could be considered an extraordinary circumstance.
Different service provider - reasonable measure?
The European Court of Justice ruled that staff shortages at airport operators can constitute an extraordinary circumstance. To avoid compensating passengers, the airline must demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable no matter what measures they took.
In this case, as a reasonable measure, the airline could have used another service provider with enough capacity to provide the service without delay.
IUNO's opinion
The case shows that delays due to staff shortages when loading baggage can constitute an extraordinary circumstance and exempt the airline from paying compensation - if all reasonable measures have been taken.
IUNO recommends that airlines investigate the possibility of using other providers when facing delays due to staff shortages during baggage loading. However, in many cases, this is not possible for practical reasons. For example, when only one or a few ground-handling companies are present at the airport. In addition, in strike situations, it is forbidden to use another service provider to compensate for staff shortages at the provider. In those cases, there are fewer requirements for when all reasonable measures have been taken.
[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 May 2024 in case C-405/23]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Junior legal advisor
Albert
Berg Giese
Legal assistant
Albert
Vestergaard Mogensen
Junior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor
Andrea
Liva Lyngbye-Ottesen
Junior legal assistant
Andreas
Odgaard Christensen
Junior legal assistant
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Ferguson Bille-Biggart
Junior legal advisor
Anna
Laura Brohl Larsen
Legal assistant
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Senior legal advisor
Asla
Tui Casey Belusa
Junior legal assistant
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal advisor
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniela
Zaragoza-Schultz
Junior legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Junior legal advisor
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Emilie
Mehl Bagger
Legal assistant
Emily
Mortensen
Junior legal assistant
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Freja
Pedersen
Legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Senior legal manager
Isabella
Fjording
Legal assistant
Johanne
Alberte Liljeborg
Junior legal advisor
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal advisor
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Senior legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal assistant
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Senior legal advisor
Mathias
Rex Brohus
Legal assistant
Mathilde
Bjørn Bjerring
Legal assistant
Mathilde
Stenderup
Legal assistant
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Merle
Frisendahl Fog
Legal assistant
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Legal advisor
Najat
Ibrahim
Junior legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Senior legal advisor
Simon
Saaby-Lamer
Junior legal assistant
Thilde
Zwicki Meulengracht
Junior legal assistant
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor