EN
Aviation

Strike in the sister company

logo
Legal news
calendar 12 June 2024
globus Denmark

In a new ruling, the Danish Western High Court has determined that a strike in an air carrier's sister company can indeed be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control – even if the companies share a common name.

A group of passengers was to travel from Aalborg to Oslo via Copenhagen. Their flight was canceled due to an unlawful strike by ground handling staff, who were employed by a sister company associated with the air carrier, and which had partially the same name as the air carrier. The question was whether the strike could be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control that could exempt the air carrier from a compensation claim.

Internal or external

The court concluded that the cancellation was due to external events beyond the air carrier's control. The court emphasized that:

  • The strike was unannounced
  • The air carrier and the ground handling company had the same parent company but no influence on each other
  • The ground handling staff also handled baggage for a number of other air carriers on equal terms with the defendant air carrier

Therefore, the Western High Court found that it was an extraordinary circumstance. The Eastern High Court had previously reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case. The difference was that in this case, sufficient evidence was presented to convince the court that the two companies operated independently of each other – even though they partially shared the same name.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that even if an air carrier purchases ground handling services from a sister company, a strike in the sister company should still be considered an external strike if the companies operate independently of each other.

IUNO recommends that air carriers ensure that when they purchase services from affiliated companies, it should be done on an arm's length basis and in such a way that the companies operate independently of each other. If this is adhered to, a strike in a sister company will constitute an extraordinary circumstance. In this way, the air carrier will be exempt from the obligation to pay compensation as a result of the strike.

[The Danish Western High Court's ruling of April 23, 2024, in case BS-31914/2023-VLR]

A group of passengers was to travel from Aalborg to Oslo via Copenhagen. Their flight was canceled due to an unlawful strike by ground handling staff, who were employed by a sister company associated with the air carrier, and which had partially the same name as the air carrier. The question was whether the strike could be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control that could exempt the air carrier from a compensation claim.

Internal or external

The court concluded that the cancellation was due to external events beyond the air carrier's control. The court emphasized that:

  • The strike was unannounced
  • The air carrier and the ground handling company had the same parent company but no influence on each other
  • The ground handling staff also handled baggage for a number of other air carriers on equal terms with the defendant air carrier

Therefore, the Western High Court found that it was an extraordinary circumstance. The Eastern High Court had previously reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case. The difference was that in this case, sufficient evidence was presented to convince the court that the two companies operated independently of each other – even though they partially shared the same name.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that even if an air carrier purchases ground handling services from a sister company, a strike in the sister company should still be considered an external strike if the companies operate independently of each other.

IUNO recommends that air carriers ensure that when they purchase services from affiliated companies, it should be done on an arm's length basis and in such a way that the companies operate independently of each other. If this is adhered to, a strike in a sister company will constitute an extraordinary circumstance. In this way, the air carrier will be exempt from the obligation to pay compensation as a result of the strike.

[The Danish Western High Court's ruling of April 23, 2024, in case BS-31914/2023-VLR]

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Similar

logo
Aviation

26 May 2025

Claims for compensation and interest must be sent to the correct email address

logo
Aviation

22 April 2025

Regulation 261/2004 does not cover helicopter transport

logo
Aviation

18 February 2025

A passenger’s own rebooking did not grant compensation

logo
Aviation

22 January 2025

Internal documentation was sufficient

logo
Aviation

18 December 2024

Sweden to abolish aviation tax

logo
Aviation

11 December 2024

ICAO raises airline liability limits

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Junior legal advisor

Albert

Berg Giese

Legal assistant

Albert

Vestergaard Mogensen

Junior legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Senior legal advisor

Anna

Bonander

Legal advisor

Anna

Ferguson Bille-Biggart

Junior legal advisor

Anna

Kreutzmann

Legal manager

Anna

Laura Brohl Larsen

Legal assistant

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Senior legal assistant

Anton

Winther Hansen

Senior legal advisor

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Senior legal advisor

Asla

Tui Casey Belusa

Junior legal assistant

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Associate

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Caroline

Sofie Urup Malmstrøm

Senior legal assistant

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Legal advisor

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal advisor

Daniela

Zaragoza-Schultz

Junior legal assistant

Ea

Tingkær Hesselfeldt

Legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Junior legal advisor

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Senior legal advisor

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Legal advisor

Emilie

Mehl Bagger

Legal assistant

Emily

Mortensen

Junior legal assistant

Feline

Honoré Jepsen

Legal assistant

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Senior legal assistant

Freja

Pedersen

Legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Associate

Gustav

Vestergaard

Senior legal assistant

Holger

Koch-Klarskov

Legal advisor

Ian

Englev Jensen

Legal assistant

Ida

Marie Skovgaard Rubæk

Senior legal manager

Isabella

Fjording

Legal assistant

Johanne

Alberte Liljeborg

Junior legal advisor

Julia

Wolfe

Legal advisor

Kaisa

Maria Falkenberg Lending

Junior legal advisor

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Senior legal advisor

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Senior legal manager

Kateryna

Buriak

Legal advisor

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Luna

Bennesen

Legal assistant

Marie

Møller Christensen

Legal advisor

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Senior legal advisor

Mathias

Rex Brohus

Legal assistant

Mathilde

Bjørn Bjerring

Legal assistant

Mathilde

Stenderup

Legal assistant

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Merle

Frisendahl Fog

Legal assistant

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Legal advisor

Najat

Ibrahim

Junior legal assistant

Nourchaine

Sellami

Legal advisor

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Legal advisor

Selma

Agopian

Senior Associate, EU-advokat

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Legal advisor

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal advisor

Simon

Saaby-Lamer

Junior legal assistant

Thilde

Zwicki Meulengracht

Junior legal assistant

Victoria

Mai Gregaard Handberg

Legal advisor

Viktoria

Eline Hegelund

Senior legal assistant