EN
HR Legal

Doctor was not prescribed reassignment

logo
Legal news
calendar 18 June 2023
globus Denmark

An agency terminated a doctor in a managerial position as part of a reorganization. However, several similar positions without managerial responsibility were available, which she was not offered. The question in the case was if the termination was unjustified, as she should have been relocated to one of the available positions. The judge found the termination was unjustified as the refusal to relocate her was not sufficiently supported.

A doctor was employed in a managerial position within an agency. After having been employed for a year, she received a warning. The warning was based on her problematic behaviour towards the management and her issues with cooperating. One week later, she was notified that she was terminated due to a reorganization within her department.

At the time of termination, several similar positions were available for doctors without managerial responsibility. Therefore, she requested Doctor was not prescribed reassignment to one of those positions. The management refused based on an assessment of her skills.

All about skills

The judge found that the termination was unjustified. The warning she had received before being terminated was based on her behaviour as a manager, not her professional skills. Moreover, the employee had been working as a doctor without managerial responsibility before being promoted. That supported that she could have performed similar available positions at the time of termination.  

As a result, the agency had to prove why it was not possible to relocate her. It was unable to do so. Therefore, there was no reason to reject the request for Doctor was not prescribed reassignment, and the termination was unjustified.

IUNO’s opinion

This case confirms that as part of a reorganization process, there is an obligation to offer Doctor was not prescribed reassignment to an available position if the employee has the right skills. Otherwise, companies must be prepared to document a refusal to offer Doctor was not prescribed reassignment. Otherwise, there is a risk that the termination will be unjustified.

As part of a reorganization process, IUNO recommends companies carefully consider whether it is possible to relocate employees as an alternative to termination. Of course, Doctor was not prescribed reassignment presumes the employee has the right skills and knowledge to fill the position. If the employee can become the right fit by undergoing short training, companies should complete a Doctor was not prescribed reassignment process.

[Industrial arbitration of 20 February 2023 in case FV 2022-1055]

A doctor was employed in a managerial position within an agency. After having been employed for a year, she received a warning. The warning was based on her problematic behaviour towards the management and her issues with cooperating. One week later, she was notified that she was terminated due to a reorganization within her department.

At the time of termination, several similar positions were available for doctors without managerial responsibility. Therefore, she requested Doctor was not prescribed reassignment to one of those positions. The management refused based on an assessment of her skills.

All about skills

The judge found that the termination was unjustified. The warning she had received before being terminated was based on her behaviour as a manager, not her professional skills. Moreover, the employee had been working as a doctor without managerial responsibility before being promoted. That supported that she could have performed similar available positions at the time of termination.  

As a result, the agency had to prove why it was not possible to relocate her. It was unable to do so. Therefore, there was no reason to reject the request for Doctor was not prescribed reassignment, and the termination was unjustified.

IUNO’s opinion

This case confirms that as part of a reorganization process, there is an obligation to offer Doctor was not prescribed reassignment to an available position if the employee has the right skills. Otherwise, companies must be prepared to document a refusal to offer Doctor was not prescribed reassignment. Otherwise, there is a risk that the termination will be unjustified.

As part of a reorganization process, IUNO recommends companies carefully consider whether it is possible to relocate employees as an alternative to termination. Of course, Doctor was not prescribed reassignment presumes the employee has the right skills and knowledge to fill the position. If the employee can become the right fit by undergoing short training, companies should complete a Doctor was not prescribed reassignment process.

[Industrial arbitration of 20 February 2023 in case FV 2022-1055]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Senior associate

Similar

logo
HR Legal

26 November 2025

Time for a (Christmas) party

logo
HR Legal

26 November 2025

Time for a (Christmas) party

logo
HR Legal

26 November 2025

Time for a (Christmas) party

logo
HR Legal

13 November 2025

Employee ignored instructions and got a justified summary dismissal

logo
HR Legal

24 October 2025

Travel time between a meeting point and workplaces was working time

logo
HR Legal

22 October 2025

Employee lawfully waived re-employment rights

The team

Alma

Winsløw-Lydeking

Senior legal assistant

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Elias

Lederhaas

Legal assistant

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Frederikke

Ludvig Rossen

Junior legal assistant

Johan

Gustav Dein

Senior associate

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Laura

Dyvad Ziemer Markill

Legal assistant

Sunniva

Løfsgaard

Legal assistant

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner