EN
HR Legal

Employee lawfully waived re-employment rights

logo
Legal news
calendar 22 October 2025
globus Norway

An employee waived his preferential right to re-employment as part of a severance agreement. However, a few months after his termination, when a new position opened, he tried to reclaim that right. The Norwegian Court of Appeal found that the employee had effectively waived his right to future positions in the company.

Over the course of seven years, an employee left and was rehired by the same company multiple times due to redundancy. Each time, he signed a severance agreement that kept his preferential right to re-employment.

In his final termination, things were different. The severance agreement was written in English rather than Norwegian, and this time, he waived his re-employment rights. When a new position became available a few months later, he wanted to use his preferential right to be rehired.

The Norwegian Court of Appeal ruled that the employee had lawfully waived this right. The severance agreement was enforceable, so the company was not required to rehire him. The Court also emphasised that the use of English did not affect the outcome. English was the company’s corporate language, and the employee described himself as fluent. Overall, the agreement was fair and reasonable.

IUNO’s opinion

It is common for employees to waive their re-employment rights as part of a severance agreement. However, this case shows that companies should ensure that employees understand what they’re agreeing to.

IUNO recommends that companies generally design agreements in a way that is easy to understand. If the corporate language is English, and the employee has expressed they understand it, there is usually no need to write the agreement in the local language. Most importantly, employees should always be encouraged and given time to seek legal advice before signing.

[The Norwegian Gulating Court of Appeals’ judgement LG-2024-160104 of 1 July 2025]

Over the course of seven years, an employee left and was rehired by the same company multiple times due to redundancy. Each time, he signed a severance agreement that kept his preferential right to re-employment.

In his final termination, things were different. The severance agreement was written in English rather than Norwegian, and this time, he waived his re-employment rights. When a new position became available a few months later, he wanted to use his preferential right to be rehired.

The Norwegian Court of Appeal ruled that the employee had lawfully waived this right. The severance agreement was enforceable, so the company was not required to rehire him. The Court also emphasised that the use of English did not affect the outcome. English was the company’s corporate language, and the employee described himself as fluent. Overall, the agreement was fair and reasonable.

IUNO’s opinion

It is common for employees to waive their re-employment rights as part of a severance agreement. However, this case shows that companies should ensure that employees understand what they’re agreeing to.

IUNO recommends that companies generally design agreements in a way that is easy to understand. If the corporate language is English, and the employee has expressed they understand it, there is usually no need to write the agreement in the local language. Most importantly, employees should always be encouraged and given time to seek legal advice before signing.

[The Norwegian Gulating Court of Appeals’ judgement LG-2024-160104 of 1 July 2025]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Similar

logo
HR Legal

24 September 2025

Reassignment assessment was not required for a slap in the face

logo
HR Legal

17 September 2025

A written warning was not enough to prevent sexual harassment

logo
HR Legal

1 September 2025

Legal to terminate whistleblower, but not to remove his duties

logo
HR Legal

1 September 2025

Changes to terms and conditions may trigger the rules on mass redundancies

logo
HR Legal

29 August 2025

New ruling confirms that Norway can apply strict rules on temporary hiring

logo
HR Legal

1 July 2025

New convention on violence and harassment in the workplace

The team

Alma

Winsløw-Lydeking

Senior legal assistant

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Elias

Lederhaas

Legal assistant

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Frederikke

Ludvig Rossen

Junior legal assistant

Johan

Gustav Dein

Senior associate

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Laura

Dyvad Ziemer Markill

Legal assistant

Sunniva

Løfsgaard

Legal assistant

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner