Employee lawfully waived re-employment rights
An employee waived his preferential right to re-employment as part of a severance agreement. However, a few months after his termination, when a new position opened, he tried to reclaim that right. The Norwegian Court of Appeal found that the employee had effectively waived his right to future positions in the company.
Over the course of seven years, an employee left and was rehired by the same company multiple times due to redundancy. Each time, he signed a severance agreement that kept his preferential right to re-employment.
In his final termination, things were different. The severance agreement was written in English rather than Norwegian, and this time, he waived his re-employment rights. When a new position became available a few months later, he wanted to use his preferential right to be rehired.
The Norwegian Court of Appeal ruled that the employee had lawfully waived this right. The severance agreement was enforceable, so the company was not required to rehire him. The Court also emphasised that the use of English did not affect the outcome. English was the company’s corporate language, and the employee described himself as fluent. Overall, the agreement was fair and reasonable.
IUNO’s opinion
It is common for employees to waive their re-employment rights as part of a severance agreement. However, this case shows that companies should ensure that employees understand what they’re agreeing to.
IUNO recommends that companies generally design agreements in a way that is easy to understand. If the corporate language is English, and the employee has expressed they understand it, there is usually no need to write the agreement in the local language. Most importantly, employees should always be encouraged and given time to seek legal advice before signing.
[The Norwegian Gulating Court of Appeals’ judgement LG-2024-160104 of 1 July 2025]
Over the course of seven years, an employee left and was rehired by the same company multiple times due to redundancy. Each time, he signed a severance agreement that kept his preferential right to re-employment.
In his final termination, things were different. The severance agreement was written in English rather than Norwegian, and this time, he waived his re-employment rights. When a new position became available a few months later, he wanted to use his preferential right to be rehired.
The Norwegian Court of Appeal ruled that the employee had lawfully waived this right. The severance agreement was enforceable, so the company was not required to rehire him. The Court also emphasised that the use of English did not affect the outcome. English was the company’s corporate language, and the employee described himself as fluent. Overall, the agreement was fair and reasonable.
IUNO’s opinion
It is common for employees to waive their re-employment rights as part of a severance agreement. However, this case shows that companies should ensure that employees understand what they’re agreeing to.
IUNO recommends that companies generally design agreements in a way that is easy to understand. If the corporate language is English, and the employee has expressed they understand it, there is usually no need to write the agreement in the local language. Most importantly, employees should always be encouraged and given time to seek legal advice before signing.
[The Norwegian Gulating Court of Appeals’ judgement LG-2024-160104 of 1 July 2025]
Receive our newsletter

Anders
Etgen Reitz
PartnerSimilar
The team

Alma
Winsløw-Lydeking
Senior legal assistant
Anders
Etgen Reitz
Partner
Cecillie
Groth Henriksen
Senior associate
Elias
Lederhaas
Legal assistant
Emilie
Louise Børsch
Associate
Frederikke
Ludvig Rossen
Junior legal assistant
Johan
Gustav Dein
Senior associate
Kirsten
Astrup
Managing associate
Laura
Dyvad Ziemer Markill
Legal assistant
Sunniva
Løfsgaard
Legal assistant