EN
HR Legal

Resigning after an anti-Romani shopping experience

logo
Legal news
calendar 10 April 2023
globus Sweden

A shop assistant resigned from her job at a retail shop after several racist incidents. While at work, she had been subject to anti-Romani slurs towards her from both colleagues and her managers, which naturally had made her feel unsafe and forced to resign. Despite the hostile workplace environment, the Labor Court ruled that her resignation was not provoked by the company.

At a retail shop in Malmö, a shop assistant resigned from her job because of racist incidents. The incidents included managers instructing the employees to monitor customers of Romani origin who came into the shop. She also felt as if she had been personally subjected to racist comments from the managers and colleagues. All of that had created conflicts and made her feel excluded from the social working environment.

The question in the Labor Court was whether the resignation was provoked by the company and therefore could be seen as a termination.

Resignation was not provoked

The Labor Court found that the resignation was not provoked by the company.

It was clear to the Labor Court that racist comments had been made at the workplace while the employee was present. Therefore, the Labor Court acknowledged that she could have felt unsafe and worried about how she would be treated by the company if her Romani origin became known.

However, the court emphasized that she could have told her managers how she experienced the comments and actions during one-on-one meetings. Since the employee had never told the company that she felt unsafe or why, the resignation was not caused by the company’s behavior.

IUNO’s opinion

An employee’s resignation is generally binding. However, if the resignation is provoked by the company’s behavior, an employee’s resignation can be seen as a termination by the company. In that case, the company will be considered to have terminated the employee, and the company would have to prove it was justified. If the company does not have cause, the resignation can be reversed, and the company may risk compensation claims.

IUNO recommends companies to deal with conflicts in the workplace with care. It is useful to document communication with employees where there is a conflict. It is also important that an employee does not feel compelled to resign after a conflict at the workplace. If they do, it can be seen as a provoked resignation. If an employee resigns in a conflict situation, it might be wise to consider giving the employee some time to reflect.

[The Swedish Labour Court’s decision of 1 March 2023 in case 11/23]

At a retail shop in Malmö, a shop assistant resigned from her job because of racist incidents. The incidents included managers instructing the employees to monitor customers of Romani origin who came into the shop. She also felt as if she had been personally subjected to racist comments from the managers and colleagues. All of that had created conflicts and made her feel excluded from the social working environment.

The question in the Labor Court was whether the resignation was provoked by the company and therefore could be seen as a termination.

Resignation was not provoked

The Labor Court found that the resignation was not provoked by the company.

It was clear to the Labor Court that racist comments had been made at the workplace while the employee was present. Therefore, the Labor Court acknowledged that she could have felt unsafe and worried about how she would be treated by the company if her Romani origin became known.

However, the court emphasized that she could have told her managers how she experienced the comments and actions during one-on-one meetings. Since the employee had never told the company that she felt unsafe or why, the resignation was not caused by the company’s behavior.

IUNO’s opinion

An employee’s resignation is generally binding. However, if the resignation is provoked by the company’s behavior, an employee’s resignation can be seen as a termination by the company. In that case, the company will be considered to have terminated the employee, and the company would have to prove it was justified. If the company does not have cause, the resignation can be reversed, and the company may risk compensation claims.

IUNO recommends companies to deal with conflicts in the workplace with care. It is useful to document communication with employees where there is a conflict. It is also important that an employee does not feel compelled to resign after a conflict at the workplace. If they do, it can be seen as a provoked resignation. If an employee resigns in a conflict situation, it might be wise to consider giving the employee some time to reflect.

[The Swedish Labour Court’s decision of 1 March 2023 in case 11/23]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Similar

logo
HR Legal

13 May 2023

Tips on employees’ tips

logo
HR Legal

30 April 2023

Reduced hours raised eyebrows

logo
HR Legal

30 April 2023

Resignation was a fact not a fake

logo
HR Legal

30 April 2023

When sabotage became self-sabotage

logo
HR Legal

10 April 2023

New rules for group companies adopted

logo
HR Legal

10 April 2023

Put on your safety pants

The team

Alexandra

Jensen

Legal advisor

Amalie

Starup Poulsen

Legal advisor

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Emma

Sandner

Legal manager

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Julie

Meyer

Legal assistant

Kirsten

Astrup

Senior associate

Sofie

Aurora Braut Bache

Senior associate

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner