EN
HR Legal

Self-employed was protected against discrimination

logo
Legal news
calendar 26 February 2023
globus Denmark

In Poland, a company decided to cancel and stop renewing contracts with a self-employed person. This happened just after he published a music video with his partner, promoting tolerance towards same-sex couples. The European Court of Justice ruled that self-employed persons can be protected against discrimination based on their sexual orientation.

Over seven years, a self-employed person had concluded a series of contracts for providing services to a TV channel in Poland. Among other things, he had been editing broadcasts and making trailers for the company. However, two days after publishing his music video about tolerance for same-sex couples, the company decided to cancel the contract and stop offering him renewals.

He took the case to court in Poland, where he submitted a claim for compensation on the grounds of discrimination due to his sexual orientation.

Therefore, the European Court of Justice had to consider whether the non-discrimination rules covered self-employed persons and if the decision to stop the contract renewal constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Genuine and stable work is crucial

Self-employed persons can be covered by the non-discrimination rules, subject to certain conditions. The decision not to renew the contracts also constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation.

When determining whether the non-discrimination rules cover self-employed persons, it plays a role if the work performed is characterized by a degree of stability. In this case, the self-employed person had worked consistently for the company. He had been providing his services on a personal and regular basis, and the money from the company had almost been his entire income.

The European Court of Justice also considered that the decision not to renew the contracts on the grounds of sexual orientation was covered by the non-discrimination rules. The reason was that the decision was equivalent to terminating an actual employee. As a result of the decision not to renew the contracts, the self-employed person had lost his income and been put in a vulnerable position, just as a terminated employee would have been.

IUNO’s opinion

In this case, the European Court of Justice considered the scope of the EU directive establishing a framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. This EU directive was implemented with the Danish rules on non-discrimination in the labor market. With this decision, it may be unlawful to discriminate against self-employed persons from now on.

Under the non-discrimination rules, there is also a prohibition to discriminate based on religion, belief, disability, or age, for example. Although this case is related to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, the outcome could be the same in other cases. We have previously written about the rules on age discrimination here.

Generally, IUNO naturally recommends that companies are careful not to discriminate against anyone. However, from now on, companies should be particularly attentive to the fact that it is not only regular employees who are protected against discrimination. The scope of protection may extend to consultants and other self-employed persons.

[The European Court of Justice’s judgment of 12 January 2023 in case C-356/21]

Over seven years, a self-employed person had concluded a series of contracts for providing services to a TV channel in Poland. Among other things, he had been editing broadcasts and making trailers for the company. However, two days after publishing his music video about tolerance for same-sex couples, the company decided to cancel the contract and stop offering him renewals.

He took the case to court in Poland, where he submitted a claim for compensation on the grounds of discrimination due to his sexual orientation.

Therefore, the European Court of Justice had to consider whether the non-discrimination rules covered self-employed persons and if the decision to stop the contract renewal constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Genuine and stable work is crucial

Self-employed persons can be covered by the non-discrimination rules, subject to certain conditions. The decision not to renew the contracts also constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation.

When determining whether the non-discrimination rules cover self-employed persons, it plays a role if the work performed is characterized by a degree of stability. In this case, the self-employed person had worked consistently for the company. He had been providing his services on a personal and regular basis, and the money from the company had almost been his entire income.

The European Court of Justice also considered that the decision not to renew the contracts on the grounds of sexual orientation was covered by the non-discrimination rules. The reason was that the decision was equivalent to terminating an actual employee. As a result of the decision not to renew the contracts, the self-employed person had lost his income and been put in a vulnerable position, just as a terminated employee would have been.

IUNO’s opinion

In this case, the European Court of Justice considered the scope of the EU directive establishing a framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. This EU directive was implemented with the Danish rules on non-discrimination in the labor market. With this decision, it may be unlawful to discriminate against self-employed persons from now on.

Under the non-discrimination rules, there is also a prohibition to discriminate based on religion, belief, disability, or age, for example. Although this case is related to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, the outcome could be the same in other cases. We have previously written about the rules on age discrimination here.

Generally, IUNO naturally recommends that companies are careful not to discriminate against anyone. However, from now on, companies should be particularly attentive to the fact that it is not only regular employees who are protected against discrimination. The scope of protection may extend to consultants and other self-employed persons.

[The European Court of Justice’s judgment of 12 January 2023 in case C-356/21]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner

Kirsten

Astrup

Senior associate

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Similar

logo
HR Legal

26 March 2023

Travel time was not working time while working remotely

logo
HR Legal

26 March 2023

New rules on recruitment of international labour adopted

logo
HR Legal

19 March 2023

Discrimination against protected parents was not child's play

logo
HR Legal

12 March 2023

Lack of information was not retaliation

logo
HR Legal

12 March 2023

No more time off to eat wheat buns

logo
HR Legal

26 February 2023

The bonus of bonus policies

The team

Akina

Ørum Masaki

Legal advisor

Alexandra

Jensen

Legal advisor

Amalie

Starup Poulsen

Legal advisor

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Emma

Sandner

Junior legal assistant

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Julie

Meyer

Legal assistant

Kirsten

Astrup

Senior associate

Sofie

Aurora Braut Bache

Senior associate

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner