EN
HR Legal

Tips on employees’ tips

logo
Legal news
calendar 14 May 2023
globus Norway

In a recent case, two companies had set off their expenses against the employees’ tips. The set off was made because of the companies’ increased costs for taxation and administration. The Norwegian Supreme Court found the set off unlawful because the tips were the employees’ property.

Employees at two hotels kept the whole amount of the tips received from customers. The employees were responsible for reporting their tip income to the tax authorities. However, in 2019, new rules on tips entered into force. After this, companies were responsible for keeping an overview, reporting the individual employees’ tip income, withholding tax, and paying employer's national insurance contributions for the tips.

Because of the new rules, both companies’ expenses for national insurance contributions and administrative costs increased. In response to this, both companies changed their practice based on their managerial right. Before the tips were paid out to the employees, the companies now set off the new expenses against the employees’ tips. Because of this, the employees received a smaller portion of the tips than before.

It is not the gift, but the thought that counts

The court concluded that the companies could not set off against the employees’ tips. This was because the tips were the employees’ property, not the companies’.

The court found that customers’ tips were given to the employees, not the companies. As such, tips had to be considered a gift to the employees, and the companies had no claim on the tips.

In addition, companies could not set off expenses against the employees’ tips based on the managerial right as tips is a source of income. Although tips cannot be considered salary, there are similarities, as tipping will benefit both the companies and the employees. As a salary-element, tips have special protection against the companies’ managerial rights. Any set off against the employees’ tips would therefore require consent.

IUNO’s opinion

This case clarifies the limits to the managerial right in relation to employee tips. Other cases have shown that companies have the managerial right to deny tips altogether. However, companies cannot set off expenses against the tips. This is because the customers’ tips are intended as a gift for the employees, not the companies.

In response to tips, companies are therefore left with the options of denying tips altogether, accepting the increased costs, or getting the employees’ consent to set off. IUNO recommends that companies discuss any consent with the employees. Employee consent will also require a written agreement.

[The Supreme Court’s judgement of 20 April 2023 in case HR-2023-728-A]

Employees at two hotels kept the whole amount of the tips received from customers. The employees were responsible for reporting their tip income to the tax authorities. However, in 2019, new rules on tips entered into force. After this, companies were responsible for keeping an overview, reporting the individual employees’ tip income, withholding tax, and paying employer's national insurance contributions for the tips.

Because of the new rules, both companies’ expenses for national insurance contributions and administrative costs increased. In response to this, both companies changed their practice based on their managerial right. Before the tips were paid out to the employees, the companies now set off the new expenses against the employees’ tips. Because of this, the employees received a smaller portion of the tips than before.

It is not the gift, but the thought that counts

The court concluded that the companies could not set off against the employees’ tips. This was because the tips were the employees’ property, not the companies’.

The court found that customers’ tips were given to the employees, not the companies. As such, tips had to be considered a gift to the employees, and the companies had no claim on the tips.

In addition, companies could not set off expenses against the employees’ tips based on the managerial right as tips is a source of income. Although tips cannot be considered salary, there are similarities, as tipping will benefit both the companies and the employees. As a salary-element, tips have special protection against the companies’ managerial rights. Any set off against the employees’ tips would therefore require consent.

IUNO’s opinion

This case clarifies the limits to the managerial right in relation to employee tips. Other cases have shown that companies have the managerial right to deny tips altogether. However, companies cannot set off expenses against the tips. This is because the customers’ tips are intended as a gift for the employees, not the companies.

In response to tips, companies are therefore left with the options of denying tips altogether, accepting the increased costs, or getting the employees’ consent to set off. IUNO recommends that companies discuss any consent with the employees. Employee consent will also require a written agreement.

[The Supreme Court’s judgement of 20 April 2023 in case HR-2023-728-A]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Similar

logo
HR Legal

25 April 2025

Companies must notify authorities of mass redundancies before they take effect

logo
HR Legal

25 April 2025

A better collective agreement did not cover employee

logo
HR Legal

24 April 2025

Company could limit breastfeeding breaks to two hours

logo
HR Legal

9 April 2025

Not gender discrimination to pay male employee less

logo
HR Legal

8 April 2025

Police officer with criminal relations was terminated

logo
HR Legal Technology

2 April 2025

Draft bill to ensure responsible use of AI

The team

Alexandra

Jensen

Associate

Alma

Winsløw-Lydeking

Senior legal assistant

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Elias

Lederhaas

Legal assistant

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Laura

Dyvad Ziemer Markill

Legal assistant

Maria

Kjærsgaard Juhl

Legal advisor

Sunniva

Løfsgaard

Legal assistant

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner